Talk:Bristol Free School
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Recentism!!
[edit]As this school does not yet exist this is a turbo-charged case of "Recentism". Probably it qualifies the article for speedy deletion. However, I think you are editing in good faith, so I will not propose it for CSD.
You might consider moving it to your own user space and working on it there, even if only to prevent it getting deleted by someone more ferocious than me. Greenmaven (talk) 03:56, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
- It wasn't me who created the article, but it was me who added references to give it substance. It is hardly a case of recentism - the school has been in the news for the past six months and has received extensive coverage in local and national press. There is no reason why future schools shouldn't receive coverage. As a secondary school it will automatically meet the notability criteria used by the schools wikiproject (see WP:NHS). The fact that it doesn't admit pupils for another ten weeks is neither here nor there - it has staff, premises, and approval from the DfE. --Simple Bob a.k.a. The Spaminator (Talk) 07:38, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
- I have also edited this article to try to give it more balance. I am a member of the Parents' Voice group and a Trustee of the school. I understand the comment regarding "Recentism". The school officially opens next week and I will try to reflect this in subsequent edits, whilst respecting the previous work of others. User:Westbury Parent — Preceding unsigned comment added by Westburyparent (talk • contribs) 13:47, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- As somebody connected with the school you should be very mindful of Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy. --Simple Bob a.k.a. The Spaminator (Talk) 15:10, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bristol Free School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160105193717/https://www2.bristol.gov.uk/committee/2011/ta/ta000/0118_4a.pdf to https://www.bristol.gov.uk/committee/2011/ta/ta000/0118_4a.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402102705/http://www.propertyweek.com/free-school-collides-with-property-vehicle/5022445.article to http://www.propertyweek.com/free-school-collides-with-property-vehicle/5022445.article
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:16, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Unsourced alumni
[edit]I removed the changed made in these edits, 30 Nov 2021. They claims were unsourced. Unable to find any mention through the school or elsewhere, so think likely non-notable anyway. AukusRuckus (talk) 02:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)